Take an inventory of celebrities who have insulted farmers. Do you regret it now?

When people live in the world, no matter how brilliant their career is, we should remember a word, that is, we should keep a low profile and speak carefully. What's more, you can't be arrogant and unscrupulous. Otherwise, you may inadvertently offend the world and end up being spurned by the world. Next, let's take an inventory of those celebrities who have offended the rest of the world and have been notorious ever since.

No.1 Zhou Libo: I will not attend the Spring Festival Gala all my life, because the mainstream audience of the Spring Festival Gala is 900 million farmers.

This Zhou Libo guess there is nothing that everyone does not know, right? He is the founder of the so-called "Shanghai style Qingkou". He has hosted some famous programs and was once popular all over the country. When it comes to him now, I'm afraid there's no one who doesn't scold the street. Because of his arrogant character and "big mouth", he always speaks openly. At first, he just offended people in the comedy world. This is understandable. After all, his peers are enemies. But then he made a big fuss and offended 900 million farmers, which made a big deal out of it. 1.4 billion Chinese people, let him offend the vast majority, this is not death? After the notoriety spread, it has almost disappeared in the public eye. Of course, he also cheated another person, that is, the famous writer Zhou Libo of the same name. I wonder if Mr. Zhou would have the impulse to kill him if he were still alive.

In 2012, the media asked Zhou Libo whether he would attend the Spring Festival Gala in the year of the Dragon, but he said that he would not attend the CCTV Spring Festival Gala in the year of the Dragon, and he would not be on the stage of the Spring Festival Gala for the rest of his life. The reason is simple: 900 million farmers are the mainstream to watch the Spring Festival Gala. He also said that his Shanghai-style Qingkou performance should be viewed by those with a high school education or above, otherwise it would be a torment for those who are not qualified.

In view of his words, the author does not comment, only from the TV program we have almost no sign of him, has given him the best evaluation.

No. 2 Na Ying: those who listen to Dao Lang's songs are all farmers.

In the selection of "the most influential Singer of the decade" in a certain year, Na Ying, the chairman of the judging committee of the Music Fengyun list, determined the judging principle of "the most influential singer of the decade" at the "seminar". She believes that music must be given priority to. And Dao Lang's music belongs to the nature of farmers, which is precisely because of this, when discussing the shortlist of singers. Na Ying disagreed with some judges on whether Dao Lang could be selected as the "most influential singer of the decade". Na Ying is even more astonishing: "Dao Lang is very strange, no one can sell them in sales, but his songs do not have any aesthetic point of view." So she doesn't think Dao Lang should be selected.

In this way, Na Ying has gone too far and offended all the Chinese farmers at once! If Dao Lang is really equal to the peasants, then why are the peasants not good? Why can't you get into what you call the Hall of elegance? Of course, then again, Dao Lang's songs are really good. Farmers listen, students listen, and citizens listen. Whether the work is good or not, you have to see whether the people are willing to accept it or not. What is the value of existence of what is not accepted by the public?

No.3 Wang Fuzhong: farmers have little to do with grain and make almost no contribution.

There was a popular video in which an economist named Wang Fuzhong said that in the matter of farming, the partial derivative of farmers is very small, and the partial derivative of land is very large. Partial derivative is a concept in higher mathematics, let's ignore it and look at his final conclusion: "so farmers have little to do with the food we eat, and in my opinion, there is little contribution." Of course, although his farmers did not contribute much to growing grain, he did not deny the farmers' hard work, but he disdained it. He said, "hard work is not necessarily worthy of respect, because it cannot create a new world. You can't invent it." He even thinks that "exerting strength and sweating is a kind of laziness and stupidity"!

Let's analyze that on the issue of growing grain, Wang Fuzhong thinks that farmers have little to do with grain, so in his opinion, is the grain made by magic or does it flow out of the laboratory? "hard work is not necessarily worthy of respect." you have to use it in the right place. A thief tries his best, no matter how hard it is, because his behavior is illegal and certainly will not be respected. However, under the premise of being reasonable and legal, farmers exchange sweat and land for food, so why is it not worthy of respect? In addition, he thinks that the reason why hard work is not worthy of respect is that farmers' hard work cannot create a new world. Can this sentence be understood like this: only creating a new world and inventions are worthy of respect?. That's ridiculous. After all, there are only some people in the world who can create a new world and engage in invention and creation. Are they the only ones worthy of respect?

In fact, whether a person has quality or not does not depend on how highly educated he is, but on how big his heart is. If his heart is big enough to hold others, then he will identify with and respect others; if his heart is so small that he can only hold himself, he must be self-righteous and look down on others. Society is making progress, but traditional virtues must not be lost.