Is it uneducated to bully farmers? Who on earth is boasting that the countryside can make a lot of money!

The forest is so big that there are all kinds of birds.

From a distance, since the existence of human beings, the social division of labor has been up to now, as a front-line working people have never turned around.

Farming society is good, after all, agriculture is the most important industry, accounting for more than half of the country's industry, in other words, agriculture still accounts for most of the country's wealth. At least the status of the peasants is still above the merchants, turning down, the peasants can at least find that they are more miserable than themselves. Although the businessman has some money, he has no status. Ishii tourist!

What about now?

Agriculture accounts for only 10% of GDP. What about the agricultural population? About 60%. Needless to say, this figure illustrates the difficulties of farmers.

However, there happens to be another voice, farmers are going to make a lot of money, agriculture is going to surpass real estate to become the most profitable industry, homestead in rural areas is going to make a fortune, and the state has subsidized farmers to get it. This kind of sound is particularly serious on the Internet.

Some local governments talk about great achievements for the sake of their "political achievements," or they can't do it all over the county for a few years and start all over again in a new category, which is called leading the peasants to become rich under the name of leading the peasants to become rich, resulting in fooling the peasants into messing around.

It has to be said that due to decades of multi-faceted policies towards the city, the knowledge and opinions of the older generation of farmers have indeed lagged behind and the modern society owes too much to the peasants. But this does not mean that if you have a little information advantage, you can deceive farmers for your own self-interest.

Agricultural circle editor counted, generally there are several voices, 1, agricultural subsidies can enable farmers to make a lot of money, hurry up to pay the money to listen to training I will tell you how to apply. 2. Land transfer can make a lot of money, so transfer the land out quickly. 3. You can make a lot of money by growing cash crops. Come and buy my seedlings as soon as possible, and I will recycle them. 4. Ecological agriculture can make a lot of money. I'll tell you how to do it. 5. Tourism agriculture can get rich, so hurry up to do tourism agriculture. and so on.

How did it turn out? The man is still here, and the money is gone.

In fact, the matter of agriculture, rural areas and farmers can be calculated by primary school arithmetic. How can it be so complicated?

Will the total number of farmers suddenly decrease? No, I won't!

Will the total amount of cultivated land increase? No, I won't!

Will grain production increase significantly? Neither will I!

Will food prices suddenly rise sharply? The price of corn can't stand the separation of price change, don't you think?

The transfer of land by industrial and commercial enterprises still can not do the above.

Then, of course, the significance of land transfer is not to increase production but to reduce expenditure.

Talking about agriculture, rural areas and farmers on the issue of agriculture, rural areas and farmers is an unsolved problem. The solution to the problems of agriculture, rural areas and farmers lies outside agriculture.

Just because the farmer is uneducated doesn't mean you can fool him!

For more views on agriculture, rural areas and farmers, please follow the Wechat account of farmland Circle: id:quandiernews.

Reprint must obtain the consent of the author of this headline number and may not be reproduced without authorization.