The adjustment of agricultural industrial structure should follow the three desires and three nots

To enliven rural economy further, make rural commissariat economy income rises continuously new level, adjust agricultural industrial structure in time already belonged to inevitability. In recent years, many positive explorations have been made in various places in this respect, and many successful experiences have been obtained. However, many problems have been exposed in some places due to adjustment failures. In order to avoid detours in the adjustment of agricultural industrial structure, it is necessary to sum up the successful experience and failure lessons of these years. According to the author, the adjustment of agricultural industrial structure should follow the following points:

First, we should give consideration to both long-term economic projects and fast-acting economic projects, not just one.

Undoubtedly, adjusting the agricultural industrial structure requires strategic vision, creating some economic projects with long-term and stable benefits, and striving to make farmers benefit from the adjustment of the industrial structure for a long time. this is the basis for readjusting the industrial structure. However, this type of economic project is often difficult to achieve results in a relatively short period of time, and the investment cost is high. If we blindly develop this type of economic projects and neglect the protection and cultivation of fast-acting economic projects, it will inevitably lead to a substantial decline in farmers 'income for a period of time, causing farmers to be in a state of food and economic embarrassment, and in serious cases, large-scale poverty return will occur, making the rural economic market often weak, thus affecting the smooth progress of the whole adjustment work, and even making the whole adjustment useless and deadlocked. Therefore, the adjustment of agricultural industrial structure should be good at scientific allocation, so that long-term economic projects and fast-acting economic projects become the best proportion, long-term economic projects are supported by fast-acting economic projects, and fast-acting economic projects are promoted by long-term economic projects. Only in this way can long-term economic projects gradually replace fast-acting economic projects and achieve the ideal goal of industrial structure adjustment.

Second, we should fully respect the opinions of the masses and do not play with the will of senior officials.

The adjustment of industrial structure is to increase farmers 'income by a large margin, and farmers are the most direct and largest beneficiaries of the success of industrial structure adjustment. Similarly, once there are twists and turns in adjustment, especially if adjustment fails, farmers will become the biggest losers. The interest relationship makes the peasants take the most prudent attitude towards what can be managed and what cannot be managed; they will also use their utmost efforts to verify whether new projects are feasible or not, and they will only be willing to implement them if they are sure that they are feasible or feasible. Therefore, in readjustment work, we must fully respect the wishes of the broad masses of peasants. Leaders must not engage in "blocking" and "pressure", give orders, impose their subjective will on the masses of peasants, and arouse their resentment or even confrontation. The role of leaders is to provide detailed information for the masses through in-depth and careful investigation of the market, so as to guide the masses 'business thinking and let the masses grasp more rationally what to do and what not to do. In short, the leadership only plays an advisory role in the adjustment of industrial structure, and ultimately the peasants themselves have the final say. The will of the officials who "decide for themselves" is very harmful to the adjustment work, and the most direct consequence is to lose the mass base for industrial restructuring.

Third, we should fully demonstrate and not rush into the horse.

Whether the masses or leaders, we should first concentrate all aspects of wisdom and strength on the grain economic projects to be developed, carefully analyze, study and explore their prospects, environmental adaptability, and methods for resolving unfavorable situations that may be encountered. Experts should be invited to help demonstrate and determine their feasibility before deciding whether to launch or not. In this regard, it is most necessary for leading cadres to adopt a cautious attitude. This is because leading cadres are most likely to "catch up with the waves","make adjustments on impulse" and "adjust for the sake of adjustment", and practice has proved that these practices are harmful and useless. In addition, in this regard, we should establish a sense of contract. For those business projects opened for specialized departments, contracts must be made in advance to define their respective responsibilities and rights in the form of legal documents, so as to protect the rights and interests of both farmers and specialized departments. Those who have not concluded effective contracts must not be lightly launched, so as not to cause passivity and let farmers bear losses that they should not bear.