To tackle poverty alleviation, it is necessary to "replenish seedlings" rather than "pulling seedlings".

If you are hot-headed, your work is not deep or detailed, and you start poverty alleviation projects without making long-term plans, it will be difficult to mobilize the enthusiasm of the masses, and it will easily lead to waste of resources and increase the burden on the poor.

Recently, I went to some places to investigate poverty alleviation. I found that the investment in real money and silver is very large, and the enthusiasm and expectation of cadres and masses to get rid of poverty are quite high. However, some long-term problems restricting poverty alleviation have emerged.

For example, after filing cards, rural poor households with a family of four built more than 170 square meters of new houses within a year, okay? Ethnic minority people in poor mountainous areas who have never been to the county seat have borrowed tens of thousands of yuan to start breeding, OK? This has to be seen dialectically.

On the one hand, it shows that poverty alleviation measures are more precise, targeting not only poor households but also problems; on the other hand, accurate identification is only the first step, and the long-term benefits of these measures have to be questioned. How much did you borrow from the bank and how much did you borrow from relatives and friends? Can sheep and fruit plants cope with market risks? It makes people feel uneasy.

Precision poverty alleviation is like "changing flood irrigation into drip irrigation and conducting soil testing and formula fertilization", so that weak seedlings and sick seedlings can also produce high yields. However,"there are a hundred kinds of poverty, there are thousands of kinds of poverty", if the head is hot, the work is not deep and detailed, do not make long-term plans to launch poverty alleviation projects, it is difficult to mobilize the enthusiasm of the masses, but also easy to lead to waste of resources, increase the burden of poor people.

It is precisely because of this consideration that the main leaders of Yunnan Provincial Party Committee recently stressed in the poverty alleviation survey that poverty alleviation should not be separated from the actual construction of new houses, especially to resolutely prevent poor households from borrowing heavily and causing new poverty. This warning is targeted and timely. Poverty alleviation is not a battle that can be won easily with a charge. Even if you spend the bank's money, you can't waste resources and timing. You have to think long term, deal with several relationships.

For example, grasp the boundary between external help and active participation. In the face of poverty and poverty, the government must take the initiative to do its work, but more importantly, it must stimulate the endogenous motivation to get rid of poverty. Nanmei Township, Lincang City, Yunnan Province, is an autonomous township of Lahu nationality. In the past, the poor population accounted for 90%. In those years, it directly transitioned from primitive society to socialism, and now it faces the historical leap of getting rid of poverty in an all-round way. Local people generally have only a few years of education, little contact with modern civilization, and even shy away from outsiders. Therefore, it is necessary to help them overcome their doubts and fears first and let them actively participate. Building houses and developing industries must be "heart-to-heart chat and hand-to-hand teaching", but they cannot save trouble and rush time, so they make decisions for them. Otherwise, the masses will "rely on the wall to bask in the sun, waiting for others to send a well-off", and it will be difficult to maintain a good situation.

Another example is the need to coordinate the relationship between the government and the market. Poverty alleviation needs to make up for the shortcomings. Where does the power come from? Undoubtedly, it is the leading role of the Party committee and government. However, poverty alleviation cannot be achieved only with good intentions, respect for market mechanisms and the introduction of social forces. Many poor people live in concentrated areas, which are greatly restricted by basic conditions. The government can make more efforts in road construction, bridge construction and medical education, and entrust professional work such as planting flowers, planting fruits and running markets to professional people. Yunnan Province introduced tobacco enterprises to help Achang people get rid of poverty as a whole, which increased income and stabilized, and was welcomed by the masses.

We must also deal with the relationship between the present and the long term. At present, poverty alleviation, whether capital projects or organizational guarantees, is in the "best period in history". Some people worry that once poverty alleviation and hat removal are completed, who will take care of the ending? This concern is not unreasonable, there must be long-term consideration. For example, in industrial planning, attention should be paid to avoiding "one-on-one" to prevent regional risks. At the same time, pay attention to quality improvement, cultivate rich leaders and other "potential achievements" that do not show mountain dew. In addition, endogenous motivation is not for everyone, but also to stimulate the "group endogenous motivation" of contiguous regional development.

Poverty cannot be solved in one go. Without real transformation, without experiencing the wind and rain of the market, poverty may not be able to stand firm. Fully estimate the long-term nature and complexity of this work,"supplement seedlings" rather than "pull out seedlings", so that the results of poverty alleviation can stand the test of time.