MySheen

It is better to get rid of poverty by formalism

Published: 2024-11-05 Author: mysheen
Last Updated: 2024/11/05, It is better to get rid of poverty by formalism

In view of the formalistic tendency in the poverty alleviation work in some areas, the Poverty Alleviation Office of the State Council recently issued a circular calling for cutting off the ideological roots of formalism and correcting formalism and other problems in poverty alleviation work in a timely manner. to ensure that the goal of poverty alleviation is achieved on schedule. (Xinhuanet, October 26)

As we all know, China's poverty alleviation and development work has entered the deep water area and sprint period of gnawing hard bones, attacking cities and pulling out villages. According to the goal of the 13th five-year Plan, by 2020, more than 70 million rural poor people under China's current standards will be lifted out of poverty and all poverty-stricken counties will take off their hats. The trumpet has been sounded, and the pressure is as great as ever!

From top to bottom, the task level presses one level, it can be said that the poverty alleviation work time is tight, the task is heavy. Relevant policies, measures, and systems have also been continuously improved, and most cadres at all levels have performed their duties dutifully and worked hard to achieve various targets, not only to the satisfaction of the superiors, but also to the people; if they have done a good job in poverty alleviation, they have won the approval of the superiors and the love of the people. Naturally, it is commendation and reward, promotion and promotion.

But right here, there is something wrong with the concept of political achievements of some cadres! Eager for promotion: let them do their work in a down-to-earth manner, but they are good at making false reports and making false reports. Some places even use the policy to be "flexible"-they do not want to spend time helping the poor to lift themselves out of poverty by their own efforts, but through financial subsidies to help poor households out of poverty on digital standards. "you can get out of poverty by calculating how much money you can give him."

As a result, "impatience to get rid of poverty" appeared, and her performance was mainly fraudulent, deceiving the superior and the inferior, which was similar to that of "officials with numbers and figures" in the past. In the final analysis, there is something wrong with the concept of political achievement, and the "impatience to get rid of poverty" is rooted in the black hat on the head!

It is true that the current policy is to "reward the good and punish the bad" with the assessment results, which is directly linked to the black gauze hats of cadres at all levels, and sometimes the results are not satisfactory, and whether "the poor counties take off their hats" or not is carried out at the same time as "black gauze taking off their hats." as a result, a small number of cadres are obsessed with "if you want not to take off your hat, you can only make a false report!"

What shall I do? How to deal with it? Su Guoxia, director of the Policy and regulations Department of the Poverty Alleviation Office of the State Council, said: "cadres are required to establish a correct concept of political achievements," formulate rules for getting rid of poverty, "strengthen supervision, assessment and evaluation, and invite third parties to conduct independent evaluation to achieve objectivity and impartiality."

These measures are absolutely effective, but they still need to be tested by practice.

The author boldly suggests that cadres who have done a good job in poverty alleviation throughout the country do not necessarily have to be promoted to other places, but can also be promoted locally, only for promotion, but not for departure!

In the early days, the secretaries of many local county party committees have already been promoted and left office, but they have returned to their original place to "fry back the pot of meat." it is not that they should not be promoted, but that they have completed their efforts to help the poor!

As for those cadres who suffer from "impatience to get rid of poverty" and are bent on promotion and wealth, and blindly practise fraud, they should be punished as soon as possible in accordance with the regulations on accountability and discipline, so as to set an example!

Of course, "No one is perfect, there is no gold," and tackling the difficulties of poverty alleviation is numerous and complicated, and cadres on the front line of poverty alleviation sometimes have to face a handful of gluttonous and lazy people, such as "waiting for others to send them a well-off life," and "muddy people cannot support the wall." it is also necessary for party organizations to pay more attention to and understand poverty alleviation cadres!

 
0