Do you still need to support your parents-in-law as a son-in-law? The parents-in-law gave both houses to their brother-in-law.

Do you still need to support your parents-in-law as a son-in-law? The parents-in-law gave both houses to their brother-in-law.

Abstract: there are many parents' houses around me, and so are my parents. The house is for their sons. (we are also demolition households) there is no married daughter at all. There is no house unless there is a head or a hukou in the demolition before marriage. The parents do not have a lot of money in the house, so if they give the money to the son, they will not give the daughter a penny. The daughter didn't complain, because that's what the custom is.

First of all, it doesn't matter if you consider your son-in-law's retirement. Your son is a son-in-law in someone else's house, and it's the same if it's all upside down. The property has to be reversed, and the property is acquired by the daughter and son-in-law. It is no use marrying a rich man in the future, it is the right way to marry a rich wife. And from the point of view of human nature, children owe their parents when they have children. Having children is a biological instinct and characteristic, and love is an emotion that can be sensed. Do you think it is unfair for your daughter to feel love? On the contrary, I might think it would be better not to have me in the first place.

At the same time, don't use the tone of being kind to others. This kind of remark may be a little touching to the children, but when the children start their own families, involving their daughter-in-law, son-in-law and the mother-in-law behind them, a complex relationship will be formed. if parents cannot be relatively fair to several children, it is impossible to rely on this simple ethics alone. Filial piety is the basic principle that we should all follow. Filial piety comes first, but filial piety should not be distinguished.

Who benefits, who bears. I hate that there is a kind of people who are prone to moral kidnapping. Do not understand any situation, do not ask right and wrong. I advise you to be generous and kind-hearted. You should stay away from this kind of person, because when lightning strikes him, it will tire you! If your own conditions permit to undertake some obligations, it is still necessary! If you don't have that economic strength, you still carry a mortgage and raise a child! Do it according to your ability! If you suffer more, you can grit your teeth and endure it! But is this fair to your children? Especially watching the father-in-law's grandson dress well and eat well!

Conclusion: finally, I would like to say that my son-in-law also has parents to support and earns hard money. his parents-in-law do not give a penny, and filial piety during holidays is fine. After all, he has a wife, but when it comes to support, he should find his own son. Everything is mutual. Some things are not worth doing, but should they be done? some guys say that parents give all their assets to their sons. Why should their daughters take care of them after birth, old age, sickness and death? Because they are the most children of parents, they have an obligation, as well as in law.