Where is the veto of the quality control department?

Many feed companies claim that the quality control department has a veto over the quality of their raw materials and products, but there are very few who actually have one veto and exercise one veto. Where is that veto? Welcome to express your opinions! Quality control is not easy to do, but you have to do it with your heart! It is impossible for the quality Control Department to have so much power, especially small and medium-sized units! Under normal circumstances, the quality control department has the decision-making power, but in special circumstances, the internal quality is still up to the boss! What's the point of your stubborn insistence on the raw materials that the boss says you want? Can only submit the quality situation in writing to the boss for his comprehensive consideration, after all, the quality control department can only take the quality point of view, the boss's idea is different, have to consider from the overall interests of the company! Of course, sometimes the quality control personnel work hard to pick out the unqualified products, and they not only work hard but also let the supplier scold them. If the supplier finds the boss at this time, the boss says "take it", which makes the quality control staff angry! As a quality control officer, I think many friends may have experienced a similar situation. Anger returns to anger, only you can adjust your mood. Reply to the crude protein [ts] xuridongshengyx at 20:48 on 2009-11-21 add the following [/ ts] where we are depressed about quality control! The quality control department has a veto over the quality of the company's raw materials and products, and some small and medium-sized companies may face challenges.-- I very much agree with the rough sister. Support Brother Zhou-our company's quality control department has also had such problems, but most of them are within the range of not affecting product quality and accepting concessions. Barely. Reality is reality, and we should be persistent and lenient. No way-- personal point of view: the quality control department is also a member of the company and is responsible for the company's operating conditions. on the one hand, it is to ensure that there are no major quality problems (minor problems cannot be avoided 100% even if you can replace all the raw materials with the best. It can't be said that your sales are the first in the province) On the other hand, we have to consider comprehensively: when the supply is in short supply, when there is no goods to stop production, when the price of raw materials increases greatly, it is impossible to casually adhere to the principle and ignore other departments. In addition, if there is a supplier who can sell a considerable amount of products for the company at the same time, or if a supplier can bring other benefits to the company (such as a relationship network), you can't keep people away by sticking to the principle. But the general manager needs to know the whole thing. Generally speaking, the boss will not casually ask us to relax the inspection standards. If we could keep an open mind and stand at a higher height, we would not feel so aggrieved. It's most important to find a balance.-- it's all a balance. To grasp the balance point-- to have the right to veto easily offend people, not to veto it-- the former leader said, "it is inevitable for first-class raw materials to produce first-class products." Our goal is to produce first-class products from second-class raw materials, "which means that raw materials do not want the best and most expensive ones. As long as it's qualified. I wonder if this sentence is correct?