Value purchasing, feed business biggest lie

In recent years, there is a popular saying among feed enterprises that profits depend on procurement. If this sentence is put in the stock market, it can be translated as "I am the god of the stock market". Of course, it is also obvious to be laughed at. Similarly, why is it so popular in the feed industry? In the short term, it is entirely possible to purchase raw materials that are lower than the market price, but for a longer period of time, such as one or two years, unless it is God, the probability of purchasing raw materials below the average market price is similar to zero. Some large enterprises can purchase such raw materials, not because they can "guess" accurately, but because they have the advantage of scale. Profit depends on purchasing? So the raw material merchant has become the leader of the feed seller. Then why does the feed enterprise still produce feed? Let's change careers and sell raw materials. Although the cost of raw materials accounts for a large proportion of the total cost of the enterprise, it is static (the market is equal to all enterprises) and has a small impact on the cost of the enterprise. On the contrary, dynamic factors such as sales volume, brand and service are the more important factors that affect the cost between different enterprises. Feed enterprises should pay attention to more important things. Profit depends on purchasing? Enterprises based on this creed, if they do not adjust their thinking, their prospects will not be mentioned, but will only be eliminated by the market. Value procurement, the biggest lie of feed enterprises. Some enterprises may say that the value procurement we are talking about does not mean to forecast the market, but to improve the purchasing management ability of enterprises and reduce warehousing costs and logistics costs. Some enterprises will say that by value procurement, we mean to evaluate the comprehensive value of raw materials, and then decide which raw materials to use according to the market price. The question is, the above are all part-time jobs of procurement, and it is their duty, so why pull out the big hat of value procurement? Is it necessary to create new terms such as "value production", "value quality control", "value marketing" and so on? We should deeply disapprove of such behavior. Good procurement and enterprise development. With the development of the enterprise, procurement is naturally done well. Different ideas determine the realm and development prospects of the enterprise! -- keen! Feed enterprises have to rely on scale / quality / capital flow to make money.-- A very popular slogan, worth pondering! -- with a very insightful view, unbelieving enterprises can make a comparison between the raw material market price curve and the inventory average price curve within 2-3 years to see if there is a big difference. Increasing the turnover rate is more profitable than the market. A very incisive view, a master is a master. It makes sense to say that increasing the turnover rate is more than the profit brought by the market!-- making up more and more professional, unexpected Admire-- do not be bound by rules and regulations, is the hard truth!-- Capital turnover is the true meaning of profit! -- personal opinion, the definition of value procurement should be clear, whether value procurement only refers to profits through procurement, or procurement according to the value of different raw materials, through a comprehensive analysis of the price of raw materials. If it is the latter, then value procurement is by no means a slogan. Metaphorically speaking, many kinds of raw materials can be purchased, so there is a lot of knowledge about which raw materials and quality standards you use at different raw material prices. In fact, the requirement of value procurement for people is very high, and the ability to integrate and share information and knowledge within the enterprise is very high. The enterprise that puts forward this concept may not be able to do it, and if it does, it will be of great use to the enterprise. In addition, it seems that everyone is not very interested in the prediction of raw materials, which depends on how to measure it. The purchasing curve of each enterprise should converge with the market price curve, but if we can see half a step, there may be some prenatal profits. Don't blame everyone for making a mistake in nonsense. [this post was finally edited by acrobatcn at 16:51 on 2008-4-9]-- there are raw material merchants who have good resources to become feed enterprises, but they have no management ability, marketing system, marketing brand, and talent team, which are all disadvantageous and uncertain factors for them. Therefore, raw material manufacturers will not necessarily become good feed enterprises. It seems that intel is unlikely to become computer manufacturers like IBM and Lenovo, which specializes in different parts of the value chain, as the saying goes. In the original post, acrobatcn expressed his personal opinion at 16:50 on 2008-4-9. The definition of value procurement should be clear. Whether value procurement only refers to the profits brought by procurement, or whether it is purchased according to the value of different raw materials, and after a comprehensive analysis of the prices of raw materials. If it is the latter, then value procurement is by no means a slogan. Profit depends on procurement, which can be seen from this sentence. There is no denying that purchasing raw materials that are lower than the market price is what the vast majority of enterprises have in mind. Do you seriously adhere to the latter definition? Maybe there is, but that kind of enterprise is also a muddle-headed enterprise. "which raw material do you use at different raw material prices?" this is the job of the formulator. What is the purchasing business? Ideally, the formulation system of the enterprise should have an early warning mechanism. If the price of a certain raw material is high, there will be a corresponding replacement of the raw material automatically. If the enterprise has such a system, it shows that the boss has vision and the technical strength of the enterprise is strong. If not, it may be a lack of willpower. But in any case, the purchase is just carried out according to order. Even the basic functions are not clear, if there are enterprises that adhere to the definition of value procurement, it can only be said to be too confused. As for "the procurement curve of each enterprise should converge with the market price curve, but if we can see half a step, there may be some prenatal profits." Don't think about it, it's just a good wish. apart from God, there may be only God of gamblers and hope, but there is no God and there is no God of gamblers. No enterprise says that one of its core competencies is "accurate prediction of raw materials".