The youth house is for profit? Rishengsheng: too heavy

The youth house is for profit? Rishengsheng: too heavy

Recently, politicians have criticized the youth social housing policy that only 30% of the households are better than the market price, even for profit consortia and so on. Rishengsheng issued a statement that all the bidding processes are legal and that Risheng needs to invest a lot of construction costs, saying that the profit is too heavy.

Rishengsheng pointed out that Rixiang Leasing Co., Ltd., a 100% invested subsidiary of Rishengsheng Group, was selected as the best bidder for the New Taipei City Youth Housing BOT case in 2012, and signed a contract with the New Taipei City Government on May 15 this year to complete the "New Taipei Youth Housing Construction and Operation transfer case". All the processes are in line with the bidding procedures, and the future construction process must also be handled in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations such as the contract and the Promotion of participation Law. Subject to supervision from all walks of life under the principle of transparency and openness.

Rishengsheng pointed out that the housing policy of only renting but not selling has gradually become a world trend and government policy. Rishengsheng's participation in the construction of youth housing requires a large amount of construction costs, and the payback period is very long. The follow-up will have to bear the heavy responsibility of lease quality maintenance, repair and community management for a long time. Whether reasonable profits can be made in the future depends on the smooth rental and collection of rent. The so-called profit-seeking consortium said that it is really heavy.

In the past, the Government had similar cases of attracting investment from social housing. In the end, due to the poor perception of social housing and the backlash and protest from nearby residents, it called for an emergency stop. Ri Shengsheng said that it is not easy to promote the youth social housing policy only with the efforts of all parties and the maturity of public sentiments, and finally take the first step for the social housing policy to blossom and bear fruit. It is hoped that people from all walks of life will talk about things on a case-by-case basis and avoid misunderstandings.

Ri Shengsheng stressed that the youth housing case is no different from promoting participation in the case. at present, the various development projects of revitalizing assets of the government not only achieve the financial benefits that the government does not contribute, but also have more public welfare of the housing policy. I hope that people from all walks of life will encourage and support it. Do not misinterpret the policy with consortia for profit, otherwise it will not only stifle the investment will of private investors, but also fail to take care of the vulnerable groups in society.