The certificate format of agricultural product inspector is revised. What are the provisions for agricultural product identification?

Let's take a look at the buffer period for the labeling of the products involved after the revision of the certification format of organic agricultural products in Taiwan.

1. The Committee on Agriculture of the Executive Yuan amended the specifications and schemata of organic agricultural products in Article 3 of the measures for the Administration of Agricultural products on August 24, 107, and stipulated that prior to the implementation of the amendment, agricultural products and their processed products that have been verified in accordance with the Agricultural products production and Verification Management Law and its relevant provisions, the operators of agricultural products may continue to use the old marks within one year after the implementation.

two。 The identification of the use of the old logo is based on the date of manufacture of the product, that is, products manufactured and using the old mark before August 25, 108 can continue to be sold before the expiration of the effective date.

3. From August 26th, 108, all manufacturers should use the new seal. If the product does not indicate the manufacturing date, the agricultural product operator shall provide the relevant data of product manufacturing as the basis for identification.

4. Although the agricultural product operator has renewed the verification certificate of uniform code, the products produced before the expiration of the buffer period on August 25, 108 may continue to use the existing packaging materials, and the brand name of the old verification certificate may continue to be sold before the expiration of the effective date; products manufactured from August 26, 108 shall be marked with the brand name of the renewed verification certificate.

5. The verification certificate number of the product packaging indicates the replacement operation, and the buffer period and the term of use of the old certificate shall be determined in accordance with the new and old stamp replacement operation.

Is this a good method? What do you think?