The supporting policies to encourage farmers to buy houses should keep up with them.

"Destocking" is a strong measure taken by the state to boost development and boost people's livelihood according to the existing economic situation, which will inevitably bring about a direct increase in the number of farmers 'urbanization to a certain extent, but "destocking" is not a necessary prerequisite for farmers' urbanization, and farmers entering the city cannot become an "effective tool" to resolve the inventory of commercial housing.

As far as the current situation of a large number of migrant workers pouring into cities is concerned, most of them are absolutely eager to stay in the city and hope to settle down in the city. Therefore, as long as the house prices in cities and towns fall or loosen slightly, some migrant workers will definitely make decisive moves, and the inventory of commercial housing can be resolved to a certain extent. However, being able to buy a house in the city and finally settling down in a town are two completely different concepts. Imagine how a person can become a new citizen without skills and stable income. Even if he is forced to stay because of housing, it will inevitably lead to new urban poverty.

In addition, the "urban-rural dual" household registration system, which has lasted for many years, is like an insurmountable gap separating urban citizens from rural villagers. In this way, even if some people with rural household registration buy houses in the city, it is difficult to enjoy the same and complete urban welfare as "old citizens", which undoubtedly dispels many people's willingness to settle down. Under such circumstances, the reform of the household registration system has become more and more urgent. In many aspects such as household registration, employment, education, medical care and old-age care, urban and rural integration should be carried out. Relevant supporting policies should keep up with them, so that "destocking" can be smoothly promoted.