The premise of releasing the dividend of land reform is to protect the interests of farmers.

Xi Jinping presided over the seventh meeting of the Central Leading Group for Comprehensive Deepening Reform on the 2nd. The meeting reviewed the Opinions on Rural Land Acquisition, Collective Business Construction Land Entry into the Market and Pilot Work of Homestead System Reform. The meeting pointed out that the three bottom lines of not changing the nature of land ownership, not breaking through the red line of cultivated land and not damaging farmers 'interests should be adhered to in an orderly manner on the basis of pilot projects. This also means that the curtain of a new round of land reform is about to officially open, and other supporting documents around rural land reform will also be issued one after another, and promote rural land reform in depth.

As we all know, land, as the most basic factor of production and life, has been seriously activated over the years, and even some places have lived beyond their heads. However, rural land has been in a relatively backward and rigid state, and has not formed a normal flow mechanism, resulting in low utilization efficiency and operation efficiency of land, and even abandoned and idle problems in many places. Even if it flows, there are many contradictions and problems because the relevant legal systems are not matched and coordinated. In particular, the lack of protection of farmers 'interests has made farmers fear and worry about land mobility.

Obviously, the new reform opinion regards the interests of farmers as one of the three bottom lines that cannot be broken through, which adds a safety net to the new round of land reform and a psychological safety line to the vast number of farmers. Without this line of defense, the peasants would resist land reform and would even become the greatest resistance to rural land reform.

This is also true. Looking at the reform work over the past 30 years, it is generally easier to push forward reforms that put the interests of the masses in a prominent position. On the contrary, it will be very difficult to advance. Comparing the reform of medical system, education system and state-owned enterprises, there have been problems in which the interests of the masses have not been guaranteed and the interests of the masses have been harmed. In particular, the reform of the real estate market has seriously damaged the interests of the masses, leaving huge hidden dangers to economic and social development and causing serious psychological shadows to the masses.

Because rural land reform involves a wider range of people, and land is the most important source of livelihood and livelihood security for farmers, farmers are most dependent on living conditions. If in the process of reform, the lessons of the past cannot be fully learned, the interests of farmers cannot be fully considered in the design of reform schemes and the formulation of supporting policies, so that farmers 'interests will not be damaged due to land reform, which is the key to the success or failure of rural land reform and the premise of whether the dividends of land reform can be effectively released.

From the exploration and practice of rural land reform in recent years, although it also emphasizes the need to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the broad masses of farmers and ensure that the interests of the broad masses of farmers are not violated. However, in the actual operation process, the phenomenon of harming farmers 'interests still occurs from time to time and can be seen everywhere. For example, land expropriation is basically a paper document or a notice, which transfers the land operated by farmers to the name of the government or enterprises. The compensation for farmers is also extremely low. In this way, some enterprises do not know how many benefits have been taken away from farmers. I don't know how many farmers have lost their source of livelihood and basic livelihood security because of land expropriation. Another example is the problem of homestead. When the government and enterprises expropriate farmers 'homestead, because there is no corresponding legal certificate, the compensation standard is very low, which objectively causes the phenomenon that the interests of farmers are damaged. In particular, the transfer of land management rights is of negligible value. As a result, farmers in many places have strong resistance to land expropriation and circulation.

From the content of this reform, although it includes three aspects: land expropriation, collective construction land entering the market, and homestead system reform, the core is to revitalize the right to land management, that is, under the condition that the ownership remains unchanged and the contracting right does not change, through land circulation, let the management right "live", let the land "live", and let the land use efficiency and utilization level rise. When it comes to land management rights, it will inevitably involve the interests of farmers. It involves whether the protection of farmers 'interests can be placed in a prominent position in the process of land management rights circulation. Because, among the "three bottom lines," the ownership of land and the red line of cultivated land are generally not touched by local governments, enterprises and investors, and they are also aware of the interests involved. Moreover, the relevant approval system, land use plan, etc., will also effectively restrict and restrict it. The annual land inspection will focus on these aspects. Only the farmers 'interests are not damaged, often rigid enough, too flexible, local governments and enterprises can operate a lot of space. Over the years, all kinds of group incidents and rectification cases around land have mostly been related to the failure to protect farmers 'interests and the damage to farmers' interests.

More importantly, even after mass incidents and vicious cases occur, in the process of handling, farmers 'interests are often not fully protected and farmers' interests are not truly combined with those of the land. Because of this, whether the new round of land reform can really release the reform dividend and whether the interests of farmers are guaranteed has become a prerequisite and a problem that must be clarified and solved first. Therefore, when formulating relevant reform plans and supporting policies, we must first solicit the opinions of the masses and listen to what ideas and suggestions the peasants have on these reform policies and plans, so as to ensure that the interests of farmers are not damaged to the greatest extent. Then resistance to reform will be greatly reduced.

In short, rural land reform will inject new vitality into rural economic and social development, and will also add strong impetus to the overall economic and social development. the key lies in how we treat peasants, treat peasants 'interests, and treat peasants' rights and interests.