MySheen

To maximize the social value of the land supervision system

Published: 2024-12-24 Author: mysheen
Last Updated: 2024/12/24, The establishment of a national land supervision system is a major measure taken by the CPC Central Committee and the State Council to implement the scientific concept of development and promote sustainable economic and social development, and an important part of strengthening land supervision and establishing the strictest cultivated land protection system. It is to explore and solve the problem between the central and local governments.

The establishment of a national land supervision system is a major measure taken by the CPC Central Committee and the State Council to implement the scientific concept of development and promote sustainable economic and social development, and an important part of strengthening land supervision and establishing the strictest cultivated land protection system. it is an important experiment to explore and solve the relationship between the central and local governments and promote the reform of administrative management system. Since the implementation of the national land supervision system in 2006, it has gained a deeper and clearer understanding of the social value, function, purpose, significance, work content and focus of the national land supervision system while exploring and summarizing it while working. And it has been confirmed in the work practice.

The dual system of land gives birth to the national land supervision system.

The Constitution stipulates that China implements the land public ownership system of state ownership of urban land and collective ownership of rural land, and the dual system of land is its basic feature, which is embodied in the dual identity of the government and the dual subject of land property rights. the two superimposed to form a land supply subject (government) and a transaction property right (the imperfect competitive market of state-owned land is the government monopoly market). This kind of monopoly has both administrative and market characteristics, not only the universality of monopoly, but also the particularity of transitional economy. Due to the existence of administrative characteristics, the government promotes the transformation of land resources to land capital, administrative power dominates property rights, administrative rules dominate market rules, and administrative interests dominate economic interests, resulting in that administrative power does not perform public functions, market rules do not protect market competition, and price signals do not reflect supply and demand.

In reality, the dual system of land inevitably presents the contradictions between the government and the market, the state and the society, the central and local governments, among which the coordination of the relationship between the central and local governments is particularly important. Under the condition that the government monopolizes the market and the land market has obvious administrative characteristics, the relationship between the central government and the local government is easy to produce contradictions in two aspects: the contradiction of the government's ruling idea and the contradiction of the state control path. in essence, the land market has become a process of interest game among the central government, local governments, rural collectives, enterprises, farmers, citizens and other stakeholders. While paying attention to the long-term overall economic development, the central government pays more attention to the social values of "fairness, justice, stability and harmony", while the local government mainly pays attention to economic value and political value related to personal promotion, while other subjects pay more attention to economic interests, which can easily lead to government failure and market failure in land management. Based on the irreconcilable contradiction between the central and local governments caused by the dual land system, the central government decided to establish a national land supervision system, which makes it possible to solve these two "failures".

In order to maximize its social value, land inspectors must not only create more social value at less cost from the point of view of their own value realization subject, but also create more use value as much as possible. let the beneficiary get more benefits from it, which is the starting point and destination of the social value maximization of land inspectors.

The national land supervision system is of great social value.

The social value of land inspectors in China can be divided into economic value, political value, ecological value, ethical value and institutional value.

First of all, the implementation of the land supervision system has effectively curbed the massive loss of land assets caused by illegal and irregular land management and use by local governments, and its economic value can not be underestimated. Secondly, the implementation of the national land supervision system and strictly abiding by the red line of 1.8 billion mu of arable land is related to social stability and the long-term stability of the country, and has important political value. Thirdly, we should strengthen land supervision and strictly control the transformation of non-construction land to construction land and the conversion of agricultural land to industrial land on the basis of adhering to the red line of cultivated land, so as to correctly handle the relationship between human and nature and ensure sustainable economic and social development. it has important ecological value. Finally, the national interest orientation of land inspectors requires them to safeguard the interests of the post-rich, the interests of post-developed areas and the interests of future generations, so land inspectors have important ethical value. In addition, from the perspective of the reform and innovation of China's administrative management system, the establishment of the national land supervision system is an organic part of it, which plays an exemplary role in promoting the reform of the administrative management system and solving the difficult problems of the relationship between the central and local governments.

To sum up, carrying out land supervision in accordance with the law, standardizing and restricting the power of local governments in land management and use will help to maintain the central authority and the dignity of national laws, regulations and policies, and to protect cultivated land, especially basic farmland. Protect and improve the ecological environment of land, maintain the socialist public ownership of land, prevent the loss of state and collective land assets, and safeguard and protect the legitimate interests of land-lost farmers We will maintain social harmony and stability, improve the executive power and credibility of the government, and comprehensively promote the building of a responsible government, a government ruled by law and a service government.

 
0