Make great efforts to improve the new socialized service system of agriculture

Since the concept of "socialized service" was first put forward in the No. 1 document of the Central Committee in 1983, China's agricultural socialized service system has experienced the development stages of the expansion of service connotation in the 1980s, the adjustment of service system and mechanism in the 1990s and the overall promotion of strategic position since the new century. It has initially formed a basic pattern based on public service institutions, cooperative economic organizations as the basis, leading enterprises as the backbone, and other social forces as supplements, the combination of public welfare services and business services, and the coordination of special services and comprehensive services. At present, China has entered a new period in which the development of industrialization, informationization and urbanization requires the simultaneous promotion of agricultural modernization, and the supply and demand of agricultural socialized services are facing a new and complex environment. it is urgent to form a set of effective new mechanism of agricultural socialized service and further improve the new type of agricultural socialized service system.

The great strategic significance of constructing a new type of agricultural socialized service system

The inevitable choice under the new normal of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers". With the national macro-economy entering the "new normal", the development of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers" also presents the phased characteristics of the continuous rise of agricultural production costs, the limited surplus of rural labor force, the increasing diversification of agricultural management modes, and the double growth of migrant workers' capital income and family business income. In particular, the degree of commercialization and marketization of agricultural input and output is increasing, and the driving force of agricultural growth is more and more from agricultural external factors. This inevitably requires that agricultural socialized service should be closely around these new characteristics and new trends, and constantly innovate the system and mechanism of agricultural socialized service.

The important content of the reform of agricultural management system and mechanism. The new CPC Central Committee proposes to "build a three-dimensional compound modern agricultural management system based on peasant household management, with cooperation and association as the link, and social service as the support." In practice, agricultural socialized service and agricultural production and management are intertwined and integrated on many levels. Therefore, the innovation and improvement of agricultural socialized service system and mechanism itself is an important part of the construction of a new agricultural management system. The establishment of a new type of agricultural socialized service system will help to strengthen the function of "unification" in two-tier agricultural management and provide a variety of possibilities for agriculture to break through the limitations of decentralized management.

Key measures to realize agricultural modernization with Chinese characteristics. At present, with the acceleration of the process of "four modernizations" in our country, the development of moderate scale operation has become an inevitable trend. However, China's agricultural modernization is bound to be inseparable from the basic fact that hundreds of millions of farmers are scattered. Recently, the central government issued the "opinions on guiding the orderly transfer of rural land management rights to develop appropriate scale operation of agriculture", pointing out that it is necessary to develop various forms of appropriate scale operation on the basis of adhering to family management. It can be seen that the scale of service to make up for the fragmentation of management is an important strategic orientation to realize agricultural modernization.

The present situation and problems of Agricultural socialized Service system since the Twelfth five-year Plan

The system innovation is insufficient, and the system mechanism has not been straightened out yet. In terms of ideological understanding, there is a lack of clear ideas for the construction of agricultural socialized service system. In terms of supporting measures, there is not much support for agricultural social services, especially the lack of subsidies for the main body of business services. From the government level, the fragmentation is serious, and there is a lack of unified integration of service resources for agriculture. From the market level, with the restructuring of grass-roots service institutions, public welfare organizations engaged in business activities and the loss of public service functions and other problems, restricting the improvement of the overall efficiency of the social service system.

The structure of supply and demand is unreasonable, and the diversified demand is still difficult to meet. In terms of service content, the first three items that farmers have the highest demand for comprehensive social services are information services, financial services and sales services; the first three items in which farmers receive the most external services are divided into technical guidance and training, agricultural products sales services and agricultural materials purchase services. It can be seen that the supply of services does not match the priority of demand, especially the demand of farmers for financial services can not be effectively met. From the perspective of service subjects, public welfare service subjects are more and more unable to meet the personalized, whole-process and comprehensive needs of all kinds of new operators for agricultural services because of the poor management system, low quality of the team, lack of work funds and other problems.

The collective service capacity of the village is weak, and the regional supply capacity is not balanced. Most of the village collective economic organizations in our country have weak economic strength and lax organizational structure, so it is difficult to effectively undertake the function of providing agricultural socialized services. In addition, due to the differences in the allocation of agricultural resources, the level of economic development and social factors among different regions of our country, the cost of agricultural socialized services in different regions is different, and the service capacity is also different.