How to treat the industrial and commercial capital going to the countryside

It was once the real idea of many rural people to live in a city where "life is better". However, in a village in Anji, Zhejiang Province, people have invested in the construction of reservoirs, planted trees, raised fish, and built characteristic houses with good air and environment, attracting many tourists. Not to mention the increase in the income of the villagers, but also quite earned the envy of the city people.

The environment has changed, the times have changed, and the value of rural resources has become more attractive. In recent years, with the promotion of urban-rural integration, a variety of public services and social security continue to extend to rural areas. Naturally, the distance between rural areas and cities has been narrowed. Fresh air, natural running water, high mountains and forests, clear heart and quiet air. Aren't they all what people who have lived in cities for a long time yearn for? And this is where the business opportunity lies.

If there are business opportunities, there will be the pursuit of capital, so more and more urban industrial and commercial capital will go to the countryside, or want to go to the countryside.

The poor gully, which has been unvisited for many years, has suddenly won the favor of foreign capital, but it also gives birth to a kind of fear of "wolf coming".

Farmers are weak in the face of capital and market, lack of information, insensitive to market prices, in a weak position in negotiation, pile by pile, all make people worry that these things of farmers (especially land) will become "others" or a small number of people, and the future changes in the value of resources have nothing to do with farmers.

On the practical level, there are bosses who transfer farmers' land and run away without paying the money; they will also encounter farmers who break their promises and ask their bosses to raise land prices. In this feast of capital and land, what needs to be improved is not only the sense of contract, but also standardized operation and long-term benefit distribution design.

The opinions on rural land expropriation, the entry of collective construction land into the market, and the pilot work of homestead system reform put forward three bottom lines: insisting on the nature of public ownership of land, not breaking through the red line of cultivated land, and not harming the interests of farmers.

"the first step in property rights reform should be to give property rights to the people who deserve it most, not to those who know how to make use of it." From this point of view in the process of state-owned enterprise reform, today's rural land system reform is not out of date.

At present, in rural areas, the determination of power is undoubtedly the first element. It's just that it doesn't seem to be that simple how this right is true and what the scope of the right is. In particular, the situation in rural areas is very different, even ever-changing, how to ensure that these resources in rural areas are handed over to the talents who deserve it most is the core.

Farmers have their own ways. In the process of land ownership certification, some villages in Jiangxi spontaneously set up a council and a board of supervisors to specifically take charge of the communication between farmers and represent their wishes. This kind of council is more responsible for the interests of farmers than to the government or developers. Farmers need people who are responsible for their interests, as well as people who can expand rural resources.

When industrial and commercial capital encounters rural resources, accurate evaluation of the value of rural resources is the first step to properly deal with industrial and commercial capital going to the countryside, but if farmers' right to know and bargaining rights can not be guaranteed, then it may be difficult to protect farmers' interests.

It needs to be carefully considered in terms of procedure. For example, make the villagers' right to know, supervision and negotiation more operable, so as to ensure that the villagers will not be reduced to a "silent majority" in matters related to their own vital interests. For example, the setting of trading links, the formulation of contracts, the proportion and way of distribution between villagers and capital; as well as the construction and improvement of the trading platform, especially in the increasingly developed information today, the importance of this point can not be underestimated.

In the process of re-recognizing the value of rural resources, we should design fairness in the system, mechanism and rules, do a good job in the procedure and links, and the rest is a matter of market and law.

Of course, in the market economy and the society ruled by law, there may be different opinions on the value evaluation of rural resources in some areas, and farmers may also make a decision to "suffer losses" on the basis of procedural justice. Industrial and commercial capital going to the countryside may also bear greater risks because they want to advance rashly, but rational and mature market subjects should be responsible for their own decisions. To create a communication platform and process for the coordinated development of rural resources, farmers' interests and industrial and commercial capital requires the joint efforts of more people.