Several problems need to be clarified in the circulation of agricultural land.

To promote the reform of the rural land management system, farmers should become active participants and real beneficiaries of land circulation and large-scale operation. For this reason, it is necessary to clarify the value weight and the foothold of policy welfare after the separation of the "three rights" of agricultural land.

With the continuous promotion of rural reform, agricultural land transfer has been carried out in full swing in many places. However, judging from the situation that has been carried out, there are still some problems in the circulation of agricultural land in some places, such as vague concept, lack of supervision, low efficiency, inactive mechanism, and so on, and the phenomena of abandoning farmland and wasting cultivated land occur from time to time. Hoarding of agricultural land and "underground" transactions have not disappeared, and some even lead to the "non-agriculturalization" of agricultural land and the "non-grain" of grain fields, which have an impact on agricultural efficiency and farmers' income.

In order to promote the reform of the rural land management system, we should adhere to the collective ownership of rural land, realize the separation of rural land ownership, contracting rights and management rights, and guide the orderly circulation of land management rights. let farmers become active participants and real beneficiaries of land circulation and scale operation. To this end, there are several issues that must be clarified.

First, it is important to clarify the value right after the separation of the "three rights" of agricultural land. In essence, the value of land is reflected in three aspects: ownership, contract right and management right. Under the premise of collective ownership of agricultural land, farmers' rights and interests are contract right and management right. In fact, the transfer of agricultural land is the right of land management. Therefore, when determining the land transfer price, it can only be determined according to the weight of the land management right. At present, the land transfer behaviors such as "underground transactions" in some rural areas, the so-called "one-off buyout" between farmers and both sides of the transaction are not in line with the policy requirements.

Second, the foothold of policy welfare should be clarified. At present, many policy subsidies come with the right of contracted management of agricultural land. after the separation of the right of contract and the right of management of agricultural land, whether these benefits are subsidized to the right of contract or the right of management must be implemented in specific links according to the requirements of the policy. Such benefits, according to the principle of protecting the interests of farmers, should be determined on the income of the right to contract agricultural land.

Third, the risk obligations under the rights and interests of agricultural land should be clarified. Some localities carry out the construction of irrigation and water conservancy infrastructure and put their responsibilities and obligations on the farmland and mu. Under the premise of the separation of the right of contract and the right of management, whether the responsibility and obligation should be borne by the contractor or the operator, which party owns the assets formed, and how to deal with them once the circulation period expires, these problems should be clearly defined and handled in accordance with the law.

Fourth, the responsibility of farmland protection should be clarified. The transfer of agricultural land can not change the nature of agricultural land, nor can it reduce the original quality. In the protection of agricultural land, it is necessary to give priority to agricultural land operators, and contractors also have the rights and obligations to protect agricultural land from damage.

The author believes that promoting the transfer of agricultural land management rights needs to be carried out from the following aspects. First, we should further strengthen policy propaganda so that farmers can truly understand and master it; second, we should speed up the construction of markets and platforms for the transfer of agricultural land management rights; third, we should fully understand the complexity and arduousness of related work, analyze the specific problems existing in the determination and transfer of local agricultural land rights, formulate practical and practical guidance, classified guidance, and promote reform. Fourth, it is necessary to sort out the problems existing in the transfer of agricultural land and solve all kinds of contradictions in the bud.