Who should be blamed for "transnational rush to buy rice"

After the news that Japanese rice was popular and Chinese tourists scrambled for news, netizens almost unilaterally criticized the "trenches" of Chinese tourists grabbing rice, and even raised it to the level of "patriotism". Began to worry about the impact on the domestic rice planting industry.

Colleague Xiaobao said: "what's the point of bringing back 10 jin of rice?" Do they travel just to bring back some of their own local products at a high price? "

Xiao Yang said: "I have money, I am capricious, I bought it."

And colleague Xiaowan hit the nail on the head: "Japan's own food is not self-sufficient, selling high-priced rice is just a brand awareness, eating meaning." Moreover, there have also been incidents of 'poisoned rice' in Japan. Is Japanese rice really 100% safe to eat? " .

I think there is no need to over-interpret the phenomenon of people snapping up Japanese rice. On the one hand, the high price of Japanese rice is destined to be popularized on a large scale in the Chinese market. On the other hand, China's huge population determines that China must rely mainly on itself to solve the problem of food supply, and even if there are some accidental quality problems in domestic rice, it is only a few phenomena.

However, no matter whether the news is true or false, we still want to thank it. Through this news, it is enough for us to seriously reflect on why we can rest assured that products made in China are bought abroad, and that we would rather spend more money to move back in a long way. To reverse the phenomenon of "transnational rush buying", we not only need manufacturers to adhere to the quality and safety line of defense, reshape market trust, but also need to guide and shape the consumer culture. Only by taking off the "tinted glasses" and facing squarely the love and pain of "transnational panic buying", will the consumption behavior be more rational.