The confirmation of the right of land should be regarded as "raw rice".

No matter which form it is, the peasants' property rights and interests cannot be reduced or even lost. Only by ensuring that the progress is subordinate to quality and giving the peasants "solid rights and certificates" can they stand the test of history and practice.

Confirming the right of rural land is a good thing and a difficult thing.

A peasant cadre in his hometown county complained: it is difficult to find people and the land is difficult to measure, and the village he contracted has not been measured into one mu of land for half a year. Why? Farmers each have their own "small ninety-nine": some people cultivate a lot of land, fearing that they will have the right to take back the excess land; some families go to the city and do not care about the contracted land of three to five mu; and others worry that the "related land" and "human land" they were allocated in that year will not be revealed after the measurement. The peasants were not active and the cadres were worried. The cadre said, "what if the county stipulates that the power can be confirmed in one year, but what if we cannot hand in the accounts at that time?"

The problem of rural land is in many ways. On the one hand, due to the influence of historical reasons, the property rights of the contracted land of farmers in many places are not clear, the area is not accurate, and the accounts are inconsistent. On the other hand, with the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization, a large number of farmers go to work in cities, villages merge, and rural land is faced with new problems. The new and old contradictions are intertwined, which makes the current rural land disputes increasingly prominent.

Land is the lifeblood of farmers. Although at present, land can not fully guarantee the livelihood of farmers, but at least it is a reliable way out. To unlock the "knot" of the rural land problem and carry out the confirmation of rights and certificates is a key step. The central government proposed that the "separation of rights" of rural land is to "clarify ownership, stabilize the right to contract, and activate the right of management" through institutional arrangements, so as to really give farmers a "reassuring mind". Only through the confirmation of rights and certificates, the guarantee of the property rights of the contracted land of farmers, the appropriate scale operation, the new main body of operation, and the transfer of more farmers to the cities needed for agricultural modernization can be promoted smoothly.

However, some localities are eager to secure land rights and relax quality in order to catch up with the progress. Some of them confirmed their rights without sorting out the remaining problems, and ended up with a "muddle-headed account"; others carried out projects under the banner of reform, thinking about the land of transferred farmers while confirming their rights, and even did not hesitate to give orders and set targets. Such a confirmation of power has become a "raw rice", and the farmers have a knot in their heart and let the good policy be discounted.

The peasants have a scale in their hearts, and whether the confirmation of land rights is going smoothly depends on how heavy the peasants are in the minds of the cadres. In a pilot county in northeast China, cadres entered the village, collected and sorted out more than 100 questions of various types, prescribed the right remedy to the case, dealt with them in categories, and answered them patiently, and all the difficult problems were readily solved. In a certain place in the south, there is little arable land per capita, and farmers are not active in confirming their rights at the beginning. Local cadres have conducted in-depth investigations and found out, and they have democratically decided to "confirm their rights inaccurately" and popularize co-cultivation and co-cultivation, which has been welcomed by farmers. It seems that it is difficult to ascertain the right of land, but it is not difficult when it comes to kung fu.

The situation in rural areas varies greatly from place to place, and the determination of land rights does not require a step-by-step approach, and one model cannot be adopted across the board. However, in any form, the property rights and interests of farmers cannot be reduced or even disappeared. The determination of land rights is not a new round of land contract for farmers, nor a new round of land adjustment, but the further stability and improvement of the basic management system in rural areas. we should adhere to two principles: first, we should adhere to the bottom line of the policy, adhere to the collective ownership of rural land, adhere to the basic status of household management, stabilize the land contract relationship, be fair and just, abide by regulations in accordance with the law, and dispel farmers' worries. Second, it is necessary to respect the wishes of the peasants, fully mobilize the enthusiasm of the peasant masses, and protect their rights to know, participate, and supervise, so as to change "I want to confirm their rights" to "I want to confirm their rights."

The determination of the right of rural land is related to the vital interests of hundreds of millions of farmers and the stability of rural reform and development. Only by ensuring that progress is subordinate to quality and actually giving farmers "solid rights and iron certificates" can we stand the test of history and practice.