Problems in the management of agricultural industrialization

Generally speaking, China's agricultural industrialization has made great progress in recent years, but at the same time, we must also realize that the overall level of China's agricultural industrialization is not high at present, and there are still some problems to be solved in the development.

   1, the agricultural industrialization degree is low, the market lacks the competitiveness lacks the modern leading enterprise, its core is must have the advanced equipment, has the higher level technical research and development team, can meet the market demand, creates the famous brand, at the same time, uses the modern management method, uses the entrepreneur's boldness and boldness, creates our country's unique product, forms the walnut production and the processing characteristic industry.

   2. The industrial chain of agricultural products production, processing and circulation is short. From a horizontal point of view, the ability of product research and development is low, there are few newly developed products, and the special varieties and quality of agricultural products can not meet the needs of the processing industry. From a vertical point of view, the product processing depth is not enough, processing transformation and value-added rate is low. Only when scientific research institutes cultivate excellent varieties suitable for processing, can enterprises research and develop products with high-tech content, scientific research institutes are the main body of cultivating improved varieties, and the R & D funds of scientific research institutes are funded by enterprises; only when enterprises, bases, and scientific research institutes form a strong consortium, can enterprises and bases have stamina, broad market prospects, and obvious advantages in earning foreign exchange and economic benefits.

   3. The low degree of organization of farmers entering the market also restricts the perfection and perfection of the interest connection mechanism between leading enterprises and farmers. The staying power of leading enterprises is a high-quality raw material base. The large-scale operation of the base is a prerequisite for the realization of enterprise value. Too small orchards are not conducive to standardized technical management, so it is difficult to achieve strict production technical standards and produce high-benefit agricultural products.

   4. Scattered farmers' interests are easy to be damaged. Individual farmers' ability to face the market is very weak, and the risk of entering the market is greater. With companies and enterprises as the "leader", economic interests are the goal pursued by all subjects, but the inconsistency of the original intention can not determine the equality of the final distribution of interests. Because farmers are in a relatively weak position and their bargaining power is low, there are many unfavorable factors in the distribution of interests.

   5. The specific form of the "leading" unit is arbitrary, and the management effect is not good. Specifically, in some economically developed areas, the infrastructure is relatively perfect and the market-oriented development is more mature, but the leading position chosen is a variety of professional associations, which is not dominant in technology, capital and information, resulting in low quality and grade of agricultural products. In the face of fierce competition in the international agricultural product market, the situation is grim.

   6. The role of the government falls into two extremes. In the process of agricultural industrialization, what role should the government play? some grass-roots governments fail to grasp accurately and go to two extremes. At one extreme, under the influence of the traditional planned economy, the government takes care of everything in all aspects of agricultural industrialization, not guidance, but instructions. As a result, many practices violate the laws of the market. It may cause losses to the leader and farmers, or put a heavy burden on the government itself. The other extreme is an one-sided understanding of the market economy, which means that the market economy simply allocates social resources by the market and ignores the necessary regulatory role of the government, which is shown in practice as the government withdraws its hands from the agricultural industrialization. Or symbolic management, while the leading position and farmers reject the government and go their own way.

The above two tendencies of    are both wrong and very harmful in practice. The right thing to do is that the government can neither cover everything nor let go of agricultural industrialization, but define the role of the government within an appropriate scope. On the one hand, agricultural industrialization is still in its infancy in our country. To promote and guide its healthy development, we also need to play the role of the government in planning, guidance, support and management. On the other hand, we should highlight the key points and focus the government's work on promoting the progress of agricultural science and technology.