Don't let grain make up for the "detour"

In order to further promote grain production, protect comprehensive grain production capacity, mobilize farmers' enthusiasm for growing grain and increase farmers' income, direct grain subsidy is directly given to farmers by the state finance according to certain subsidy standards and actual grain planting area. The implementation of direct subsidy to grain farmers is not only one of the important measures to implement the policy of agriculture, rural areas and farmers, but also the most convenient and effective channel, and it is also a measure to benefit the people by directly giving benefits to farmers. The principle of subsidy is that those who farm and supply each other, however, some local leading cadres "create something out of nothing", "make small into big", and play a "small abacus", resulting in a large amount of direct subsidy funds cannot be distributed to grain growers.

Why is the direct subsidy for grain taken, falsely claimed, intercepted, misappropriated, and taken a detour? "the audit work stays at 'looking at the forms and figures'," and "declare grain subsidies in the name of a number of administrative staff, employees and their families."... The author believes that it is the lax use of power and impractical work of some leading cadres that has caused direct grain subsidies to become "false subsidies", "rights subsidies" and "public subsidies for private use", so that the funds for the benefit of the people, which should have been directly given to farmers, have gone into private pockets.

In order to ensure that direct grain subsidies do not take detours, we must strictly close the examination and approval. Examine the identity of the direct subsidy object to avoid "right subsidy"; examine the use of land to avoid "transformation" of non-grain land; and audit the planting area to avoid "false compensation". Do the application audit strictly, avoid the verification and summary link becoming a mere formality, so that false claims can be taken advantage of.

Secondly, the mechanism of openness of government affairs should be improved. The object, quota, type and distribution time of direct grain subsidy will be "dried" at all levels in counties (districts), towns and villages, so as to make more varieties and more supplements, less planting and less replenishment, and neither planting nor replenishing.

Third, establish and improve the supervision mechanism. The relevant departments should earnestly assume the responsibility of supervision, smooth the reporting channels, and at the same time conduct regular investigations and random random checks on the cultivation and area of land directly subsidized by grain, and carry out sunshine operation on the distribution of subsidy funds. to make real and real compensation.

It is true that a lot of grass-roots work needs to be done to ensure that direct grain subsidies do not take detours, but "the society is the soil and the millet is the valley." the foundation of the country is land and grain. Do not let the direct subsidy of grain take another detour, because it not only hurts the hearts of the grain growers, but also hurts the roots of the country.