"the government buys agricultural social services" has become a development trend.

Recently, the Ministry of Agriculture has set up a document drafting group on the topic of "agricultural socialization service" to discuss the application of the "government purchase service" policy in agricultural socialization service and the incremental reform of the policy of benefiting agriculture.

"the government buys agricultural social services" has become a development trend.

In a country with a high degree of agricultural modernization, socialized service is a major trend. In the United States, people directly engaged in agriculture account for only 1.9% of the country's labor force, but 20% of the population serve agriculture. The domestic situation is that fewer and fewer people are farming, feeling too tired, not earning money, not decent, and so on. By cultivating and developing a new type of production main body and multi-service main body, we can precisely solve the problem of who will plant the land and how to plant it. It is undeniable that in the process of cultivating and developing new production subjects and promoting agricultural socialized services, the purchase of services by the government will become a development trend.

It is reported that the application of "government purchase service" in agricultural socialization service has been tested in many places. However, the survey found that in most areas, the purchase of agricultural social services by the government is still in the conceptual stage, and the scope of government purchase of services needs to be further defined. at present, the service areas such as unified defense rule, machine ploughing, machine insertion and machine collection with government funds are quasi-public or non-public services, and can be effectively operated through market entities such as specialized service teams or cooperatives. However, the government purchase and supply mechanism in the field of public welfare agricultural services needs to be further studied and explored.

At the same time, it is understood that many operators who undertake the government's purchase of agricultural social service projects are in a state of small profit under government subsidies, and if there is no financial support, they will not be involved in the field of agricultural social service at all. Therefore, exploring the sustainable dynamic mechanism of mobilizing market subjects to participate in agricultural socialized services should be the focus of policy-making in the next step.